i don’t fully remember the dream. but i was camping and i awoke to a large bull trying to kill me and some other animal working to protect me from it.
i was running all around this plot of land and forest. alongside a road or a highway. a bear came. it too was trying to catch me. i slid under some sort of bench or foundation. some low overhang with a small opening. the bear who was brown then blue was trying to get at me under the overhang. i remember his breath. his tongue on my face. the way his arm curled under me. i touched his long bear claws. was he eating me or holding me? i woke up.
being fucked by multiple people. i rather love this. both in real life and fantasy life. fantasizing while masturbating the other day. the people sort of turned into animals. into wolves. and they were eating me and/or fucking me. i was being fucked and i was being devoured.
fort faggot is a fort design that i began in cleveland. sometime in 2010. i have a design. the walls will be made with strings of bundled sticks. faggots. i just need a place and time to make it. the subtitle is wolves inside & out. somehow this fantasy above will breath life into this fort. i want to experiment with a place that bears this kind of darkness. it isn’t all pretty. and it doesn’t have to be about a scare. it is about walking into the fear, as kate wrote. finding what is dark and desirable together. finding what can be found there.
. . .
reading fire in the belly: the life and times of david wojnarowicz by cynthia carr. excited to have a new long book to read. but woah is it tedious. i like how she holds onto the discrepancies between all of the different people. but i think, so far, carr is too hellbent on finding the true timeline, the true testimony about the true david wojnarowicz story. only sixty-one pages in. i will stick it out… but i am not sure how this plodding along will be come page five hundred seventy eight.
quoting a former confidante/housemate of david’s in the book: “My big question was, do we have to destroy ourselves in order to be creative. I felt like he was kind of hell-bent on it. He wanted that. He wanted the dark part.”
i guess my thoughts about “darkness” accompany a question of acceptability. i find that it is not socially acceptable to be hopeless. ever. (and i say this in a moment of great hope and excitement.) to be grim about the future of humanity, human endeavors, society, civilization. it is not so acceptable to explore pessimism. to play with it. to ever embrace it. there is a discomfort with toying in the dark. there is a fear that you just might not come back. we have to assure or be assured that there will always be a silver-lining. a shiny future to come back to. and it scares me how much we don’t want to let ourselves “go there.” to take up what is lurking behind our grandest hopes and dreams. for fear that we won’t ever return.
it isn’t in order to destroy for me. at least at the moment. it is to see what happens there. this world. the u.s. is scary in its denial. in its lies and superficiality. in the way we can numb ourselves and pad our experience. the ways we have to round off the edges. to make our life palatable. to let ourselves off the hook in the ways that we cause suffering, live off of suffering, deny our own suffering.
this is rather convoluted. it’s okay though to not have complete legibility. but in reading came an addendum to the dream and the fort and the wolves and the bear.